AAP’s Third MP Gets Central Security After Leaving Party: Harbhajan Singh, Raghav Chadha Before Him, Sahney Makes Big Claim

AAP’s Third MP Gets Central Security After Leaving the Party: Harbhajan Singh and Raghav Chadha Received It Earlier, Sahney Says Kejriwal Asked for His Resignation

The political atmosphere in India has once again turned intense as the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) faces one of its biggest internal crises in recent years. A major controversy has erupted after another former AAP Rajya Sabha MP reportedly received central security following his exit from the party. This development has drawn national attention because similar security arrangements were earlier given to former cricketer Harbhajan Singh and senior leader Raghav Chadha after they distanced themselves from the party.

The latest name in this growing political storm is Vikram Sahney, who has now made explosive claims against AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal. Sahney alleged that Kejriwal personally asked him to resign from his Rajya Sabha seat, a statement that has added fuel to an already heated political battle.

This issue is no longer just about security cover. It has become a serious debate about loyalty, leadership, political pressure, and the future of AAP as a national political force.

AAP Faces a Major Political Blow

AAP has built its national image over the years as a party that challenged traditional politics with promises of transparency, honesty, and clean governance. However, recent events suggest that the party is now dealing with internal dissatisfaction at the highest level.

Several Rajya Sabha MPs associated with AAP have either distanced themselves from the leadership or openly criticized the party’s functioning. Reports suggest that seven out of ten Rajya Sabha MPs moved away from the party, creating a massive political setback.

Among the most notable names were Raghav Chadha, Harbhajan Singh, Swati Maliwal, Vikram Sahney, and others. These were not ordinary members—they were some of the most recognized faces of AAP in Parliament and public life.

Their exit raised serious questions about whether the party is facing a leadership crisis from within.

Raghav Chadha’s Exit Shocked Everyone

One of the biggest surprises was the distancing of Raghav Chadha, who was once seen as one of Arvind Kejriwal’s closest political allies. Chadha was often considered the young national face of AAP and played a major role in representing the party in Parliament.

When he left, political circles were shocked. His statement made headlines when he reportedly said that he felt like “the right man in the wrong party.” He also claimed that AAP had moved away from its original principles and was no longer serving the national interest the way it once promised.

For many supporters, Raghav Chadha’s departure was symbolic—it showed that dissatisfaction had reached the very top of the party.

Harbhajan Singh and the Security Controversy

Former Indian cricketer Harbhajan Singh’s name also became part of the controversy. Harbhajan had entered politics with significant public support and was seen as a valuable face for AAP due to his popularity across India, especially in Punjab.

After his political separation from the party, reports indicated that the Punjab government withdrew his state security cover. Soon after, the central government reportedly provided him with security protection.

This move immediately became a political talking point. AAP supporters questioned why leaders who left the party were suddenly receiving stronger security arrangements from the Centre.

Opposition leaders argued that this was not a coincidence but part of a larger political strategy.

Vikram Sahney’s Explosive Statement

Now, businessman and Rajya Sabha MP Vikram Sahney has become the third major figure linked to this issue.

Sahney reportedly stated that Arvind Kejriwal asked him to resign from his Rajya Sabha seat. According to him, pressure was placed on him despite his elected position and responsibilities as a Member of Parliament.

This statement created major headlines because it directly challenged Kejriwal’s leadership style. If true, it would suggest that the conflict inside AAP goes beyond policy disagreements and enters the area of personal control and internal power struggles.

Sahney’s words have triggered strong reactions from both supporters and critics of AAP.

AAP Denies Allegations

The Aam Aadmi Party has strongly rejected these claims and accused defecting leaders of betraying the party and the people who voted for them.

AAP leaders argue that these resignations are not based on ideology or principle, but are the result of political pressure from the central government and investigative agencies like the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

According to the party, leaders who once stood with AAP are now switching sides for political protection and personal benefit.

The party leadership insists that Kejriwal has always worked for clean politics and that the defectors are trying to damage the party’s reputation.

BJP Uses the Opportunity

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has used this situation to attack AAP and Arvind Kejriwal’s leadership.

BJP leaders claim that the resignations prove that AAP is collapsing from within. They argue that Kejriwal runs the party with a dictatorial approach and that senior leaders are leaving because they no longer trust his leadership.

The BJP has presented these exits as proof that AAP’s “model politics” is failing.

This political battle has now turned into a war of narratives. BJP says AAP is breaking because of poor leadership, while AAP says BJP is engineering defections to weaken the opposition.

Why Central Security Matters

At first glance, security cover may seem like a simple administrative decision. But in Indian politics, security arrangements often carry strong symbolic meaning.

When a leader leaves an opposition party and receives central security, it creates the impression of political closeness with the ruling establishment.

That is why the cases of Harbhajan Singh, Raghav Chadha, and Vikram Sahney have become so politically sensitive.

It sends a message—not just about safety, but also about power, influence, and future political alignment.

Many political observers believe that such moves can shape public perception faster than speeches or press conferences.

Legal Battle Ahead

AAP has reportedly approached the Rajya Sabha Chairman seeking disqualification of defecting MPs under the anti-defection law.

The party argues that these MPs were elected on the AAP ticket and cannot simply switch political sides without consequences.

However, the defecting MPs may argue that since a large group moved together, they are protected under constitutional provisions related to merger and group defection.

This means the battle is no longer only political—it may soon become a major legal fight as well.

The decision could affect not just AAP’s strength in Parliament but also the broader balance of power in the Rajya Sabha.

What This Means for AAP’s Future

The departure of leaders like Raghav Chadha, Harbhajan Singh, and Vikram Sahney is a serious blow for AAP.

These leaders represented youth, celebrity appeal, business credibility, and national visibility. Losing them weakens the party’s image far beyond Parliament.

For Arvind Kejriwal, the challenge is now bigger than winning elections. He must rebuild trust inside his own party.

If more leaders continue to leave, AAP may struggle to maintain its national presence outside Delhi and Punjab.

At the same time, if the party successfully fights back and proves these exits were politically motivated, it may turn the crisis into a comeback opportunity.

Final Thoughts

The controversy surrounding central security for former AAP MPs is not just a security issue—it is a sign of a much deeper political storm.

Harbhajan Singh, Raghav Chadha, and now Vikram Sahney have become symbols of a larger question: Is AAP facing a temporary rebellion, or is this the beginning of a long-term structural collapse?

Vikram Sahney’s claim that Kejriwal asked for his resignation has made the matter even more serious.

As accusations grow and political loyalties shift, one thing is clear—AAP is currently fighting not only its political opponents but also an internal battle for survival.

The coming weeks will decide whether this is just another political controversy or one of the defining turning